Tag Archive for: No Limits to Hope forum

Art as a discipline for ecological sensitization, beyond mere rational awareness

Environmental Education didactic proposal  is based on four fundamental dimensions for the aim of a transformative, critical, sensitive, and
democratic education: (1) Personal Dimension; (2) Social Dimension; (3) Socio-environmental Dimension; and (4) Eco-spiritual Dimension.

The personal dimension focuses on the learner’s intimate experience including their bodies, emotions, perceptions, and inner reflections. Here, the emphasis is on cultivating self-awareness as an integral part of network, recognizing that the body and mind are the first environment we inhabit.

Society and the school community are seen as a human ecosystem in constant interaction and interdependence: school, family, community groups, virtuais networks, institutions, and political forces. It involves recognizing and valuing human diversity — especially socially marginalized and historically excluded groups.

The socio-environmental dimension addresses the relationship between human beings and the physical, chemical, and biological environments that surround them, this represents the traditional and one-dimensional perspective of Environmental Education—focused on the preservation and sustainability of natural elements. Eco-spirituality recognizes the existence of a symbolic or spiritual dimension in the human relationship with the planet by embracing practices, beliefs, and rites connected to Indigenous people, traditional communities, Afro-descendant spiritualities, and Indigenous worldviews that affirm the sacredness of the Earth and the interdependence of all beings. This contribution recognizing that human beings exist within networks of interdependent relationships — personal, social, environmental, and eco-spiritual.

Art and alternative languages from social and ethnic groups, for thinking and action alternatives

I had the opportunity to read different versions of the document “No Limits to Hope” and make brief comments in emails exchanged with Mario Salomone. The following comments and suggestions are highly pertinent to a project such as this, in this historic moment.

Regarding the reasoning, the “No Limits to Hope” Initiative presents a universalist connotation, considering the human species responsible for the problems and challenges that must be faced (“how WE think and act”).

However, there are social and ethnic groups that have proposed and propose other alternatives for thinking and acting, groups who have until recently been considered savage or uncivilised and therefore outside or on the fringes of that universal “WE”.

The contemporary importance of the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America is an example of this. Books such as “The Falling Sky” by Davi Kopenawa and Bruce Albert (published in English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese) and “I, Rigoberta Menchú. An Indian Woman in Guatemala” bring key elements to the historical expansion of planetary challenges, as does the work of Cameroonian philosopher Achille Mbembe. The positioning in the NLtH document regarding notions of progress and civilisation is highly important, even if discreet. It is essential to add, with greater emphasis, criticism of models of economic development, including sustainable development, which have already been intensely criticised in recent decades, yet which continue to be present and powerful in international institutions.

Against militarism and the misuse of science and innovation

Among the problems and challenges against which we must unite all our efforts is the “continued militarism and other misuse of science and innovation”. One possibility (pedagogic, cultural, and political) to counter militarism (and, I might add, totalitarianism and negationism) certainly relates to the new “learning models, which could be anticipatory, participatory, integrative and innovative”. In this sense, pedagogic experiences developed in countries that live with or have lived through authoritarian governments, genocides, civil wars, etc., must be acknowledged and disseminated.

The document references Paulo Freire’s work in Brazil, and I would add that his political and pedagogic theory has been studied and practised in different countries. In recent decades, new generations in innumerable nations have re-signified it, remaining increasingly pertinent and necessary.

To close, I would call attention to the importance of the arts in general, which develop languages that focus on perception, respect, and coexistence with otherness and others-than-humans, aimed at the common good. We must establish dialogues and partnerships with artists who have included contemporary themes and challenges in their everyday activities, amplifying and practising the transdisciplinarity the document suggests.

This contribution is part of the comments and suggestions on the document No limits to hope: Transforming learning for better futures

Hoping for education, in a time of transition. A call for debate

“No Limits to Hope: Transforming learning for better futures”.

Why this need for hope and this need for learning transformation? Because, in 2024, forty-five years after the report “No Limits to Learning: Bridging the Human Gap”, the Club of Rome, The Fifth Element, taking up the proposal of the WEEC Network, have jointly launched a new global call that aims to inspire action by educators, learners and citizens alike to pursue a global shift in educational and learning paradigms, and together they launched the initiative at the 12th WEEC?

The answer is that forty-five years after the 1979 report, what the founder of the Club of Rome, Aurelio Peccei, wrote in the Preface is even more valid. There is a “human gap” between the human condition and the natural environment, destined almost inevitably to get much broader.

The report, as a result of the “No Limits to Hope” initiative, will be presented at the 13th World Congress, which will take place in Perth (Australia) from 21 to 25 September 2026 and will be a key event of that congress.

 

Perfectly converged lenses

The goals of the joint initiative CoR, T5thE, and WEEC and the global environmental education community’s goals, which meet every two years for congresses in different parts of the planet, are perfectly convergent.

The CoR, with its more than 50 years of existence, and the EE community, with its more than 20 years of international meetings, work for a wide-ranging and long-term vision to produce significant systemic change.

In the 1979 report to the Club of Rome, “No Limits to Leaning: Bridging the Human Gap,” the global WEEC community saw a splendid explanation of the principles and methods of environmental education (EE) that in those times had been structured over about ten years.

In the joint initiative of research and debate on how to “transforming learning for better futures” we have seen a splendid opportunity for synergies and common commitment with those who since 1968 (therefore more or less from the same years in which environmental education began to be talked about with more awareness) have given the most continuous, most authoritative and most wide-ranging contribution to research on the challenges and dangers of contemporary history.

 

At the centre of a crossroad of perspectives

Reconnecting humanity and Nature in a new Alliance, reconnecting people and cultures, reconnecting disciplines: “Reconnecting” is a keyword of the next WEEC congress in 2026.

The same reconnection is needed for education globally. It involves reconnecting educational systems, methods, and organisations with ethical challenges and crucial issues, as well as goals and daily routines with the sad reality of an unequal and dangerous society.

Contrary to a trivial vision of EE, the education on the interconnectedness and interdependence of Humans-Nature and its complexity (that is, speaking of the environment) is a broad crossroads of perspectives and the ideal ground for building interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. EE must lead a global commitment to profoundly reorganising knowledge, structures, and laws towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. This requires considering socio-cultural diversity, biodiversity, the relationalities between humankind and nature, and the place of epistemological pluralism in our field. Western scientific thinking must be questioned, and the relationships between expert knowledge and traditional and empirical knowledge must be examined. It requires changing the questions: we teach many answers, but do not pose enough new and alternative questions.

 

Action and Hope

For us, reconnecting is an educational challenge—an authentic, transformative mission. Complexity, Systems Thinking, Interconnectedness, and Interdependence are keywords closely related to “Reconnecting,” but education is also about eco-citizenship, global citizenship, equity, multiculturalism, and peace. So, EE is education both for the present (action and commitment) and the future (hope and capacity for designing and building alternative futures).

We don’t have power, properties, or weapons: our tools are nonviolent and meek. Sometimes, words and books can wound and hurt. In history, words and books prepared and legitimised wars, hate, injustices, and genocides. Our unarmed means can change minds, mindsets, science, paradigms, worldviews, and, therefore, socioeconomic models and global policies. This is an integral shift: “shift” is another keyword common to the “No Limits to Hope” Initiative and the environmental education’s fight for a new, ecological, sustainability-based, holistic culture.

It means moving towards decolonisation, amplifying, recognising, and valuing voices from the Global South, respecting traditional knowledge, and moving beyond the dominant logic of globalisation.

It means opening education more and more to pedagogies and methodologies for transformative learning, e.g., service learning, community stewardship, project-work-based activities, Place-Based education, participatory action, citizen science, skills development, and action-oriented education for making new personal, communal, and political choices.

It means considering different scales of space (local, national, global) and time (past, present, and future) to understand how elements of the environmental, social, economic, and cultural dimensions interact and relate to each other.

 

Get involved and attend the world congress in Perth (Australia)

It means paying attention to climate and social justice and cultivating a critical understanding of our current socioeconomic model and its differentiated effects in the Global South and the Global North.

It means examining educational systems worldwide, their blockages or innovations, weaknesses, and threats to propose a renewed role for education and learning.

So, the “No Limits to Hope. Transforming learning for better futures” Initiative offers many ultimate stimuli to everyone interested in assuring a safe and fair operational space for Humans without destroying themselves and what remains for Nature. And the WEEC Congress in 2026 offers a consistent, biodiverse milieu for meeting, debate, and enhancing action and collaboration.

Get involved, send comments for the Forum online, and cooperate in many other ways with the Initiative. Consider also attending the worldwide meeting in Perth.

Looking forward to hearing from many, my warmest greetings.

This contribution is part of the comments and suggestions on the document No limits to hope: Transforming learning for better futures